Writing speeds ranged from The HPSQ scores indicated that
So here is my process… Step 1: I first look at underlying skills related to handwriting. This usually includes clinical observations of motor skills, stability of supporting joints, pencil grasp, hand strength, etc.
You have to look at the foundation before you can fully address anything else. I like this test because it is broken down into three subtests which assess the building blocks for writing. Visual Motor Integration Taking in visual information and using it appropriately for motor output such as writing, drawing, throwing a ball, using a utensil, etc.
This portion of the test involves the child copying various shapes and forms which increase in difficulty. Visual Perception The ability to appropriately process visual input. This portion of the test focuses on matching two shapes when one is among similar shapes.
Motor Coordination Skilled control of motor movements. This portion of the test requires the child to draw within the guidelines of shapes that also increase in difficulty. They have to demonstrate pencil control to remain inside the lines. This test is fairly quick, and can offer a lot of insight into areas of difficulty.
If concerns are sparked by this test, a therapist can pull out other evaluations to further assess specific areas such as visual perceptual skills or motor coordination, but this is a solid place to start.
I can usually get a sense of legibility issues by watching a child complete a handwriting sample. See my review of these different handwriting programs here.
This evaluation measures letter memory, placement on the line, sizing, orientation, start point, and sequence formation. All important components of letter writing, but also observable in a simple handwriting sample. Here is my main issue with a test like this- Yes, it creates an objective way to measure handwriting skills, but does it truly assess legibility in a functional sense?
For complete credit on the assessment, the child has to start at the top, draw a straight line down, and then come back up to the top to finish the strokes. If the child starts at the bottom to make the letter… deductions!
What do I say to that? There are only a few situations when this would really matter to me: The letter is completely illegible. The child is unsure of their letter formations and is starting at the bottom out of sheer confusion. Their letter habits are slowing them down to a less functional rate in the classroom.
Their irregular letter formations are causing reversals. These handwriting habits are formed early. If a child that age truly needs to change the way they form their letters, they had better be very motivated and their parents had better be ready for lots of practice.
Think of your own handwriting. There is no way you make each letter exactly as you were instructed in school. Now you will be forced to change the way you make them. Think of how hard you would have to think every time you made an R from now on.
It might drive you crazy.
Recommendations From all of that data collection, I have to decide whether to recommend therapy or not. Technically, if anything is below average on any of my standardized tests, I can rightfully recommend therapy.
Issues like spacing and line placement can have a huge impact on legibility, and are easier to address and change. Either way, everyone has to be on board with this process.
An important idea to keep in mind during this process is to decide when therapy will be completed. This can be a sticky situation. This poor little girl I worked with had absolutely beautiful handwriting by my standards. However, her parent was never satisfied with what she saw.
It was a lose-lose situation.Chesapeake Promotion, Regina. 72 likes. Chesapeake Promotion goes past the range of conventional promotional marketing circles to create unique, targeted.
children’s handwriting evaluation scale for manuscript writing (ches-m) Description: Norm-referenced test that examines rate and quality of children’s handwriting within a near-point copying task. Formative assessment can look more structured,too, with teachers Serafini, F.
(). beginning a class period with a discussion of a short list of general misunderstandings garnered from a recent quiz, grouping students with. View Essay - Assessmentevidencetable from PED at Harvard University. Childrens Handwriting Evaluation ScaleManuscript (CHES-M) Grades Diagnosis and Evaluation Minnesota Gardners Test Test.
The CHES has both a manuscript version (CHES–M for Grades 1 and 2) and a cursive version (CHES for Grades 3 and beyond). We chose this assessment because it requires only 2 min to complete; in comparison, the Evaluation Tool of Children’s Handwriting .
“student writing assessments” is broader due to the limited number of standardized, adequate measures to assess a complex and iterative construct like writing. Alignment of K Writing Goals and Assessment Just as a comprehensive assessment system explicitly linked .