This is a very long article, the longest ever written on The Futurist. As it is a guide to the next decade of social, political, and sexual strife, it is not meant to be read in one shot but rather digested slowly over an extended period, with all supporting links read as well. As the months and years of this decade progress, this article will seem all the more prophetic. Now, the basic premise of this article is that men and women are equally valuable, but have different strengths and weaknesses, and different priorities.
Arbitration as a Solution for Protracted and Intractable Conflicts Can arbitration serve as an alternative mechanism of dispute resolution, as opposed to "conventional" methods such as submitting Enforcement mechanism essay dispute to an international or national court or seeking a negotiated agreement?
Historically, arbitration was successfully used by the ancient Greeks and the Vikings to solve interstate and intrastate conflicts.
In more recent history, arbitration played an important role in solving international border disputes. This fact can be attributed to a lack of established enforcement mechanisms for international lawand the resulting difficulty of enforcing international arbitral awards.
However, arbitration continues to be an effective tool for conflict resolution, especially for international and national commercial or investment disputes, as well as labor disputes. Arbitration is an extra-judicial mechanism through which conflicts can be solved. It is an adversarial process, which is governed by the principle of party autonomy.
This means that it is the parties to a conflict who determine whether they want their dispute to be solved through arbitration. Thus the arbitrators derive their authority solely from the parties.
Parties are free to choose the place seat of arbitration, and often do so through a contractual clause before a dispute emerges. The parties determine the "rules of the game," either by designing the process themselves or by choosing the seat of arbitration.
In the latter case the parties agree to make use of existing institutions, which provide facilities and a set of adopted rules that govern the process. In most cases, arbitral awards are conclusive, final, and binding. However, it can occur that the unsuccessful party challenges the award by claiming that the arbitrators exceeded their power, or by asserting that they cannot be bound by a foreign award.
In a small number of cases, national arbitration legislation allows for the right of appeal. Current Domains of Arbitration Though historically important for the resolution of non-commercial international disputes, arbitration is not often used in that way currently.
Today it is widely used for commercial and investment disputes by states and private entities. The fact that arbitration allows parties to determine the rules of procedure is particularly advantageous in cases where companies involved in commercial and investment disputes are founded in and governed by different legal systems.
Arbitration allows the parties to determine the seat and rules of procedure through a contractual arbitration clause, and hence preempts conflicts over jurisdiction. The parties' ability to choose an arbitrator guarantees high quality decisions, because they can nominate experts in the field.
Furthermore, disclosure of trade secrets is avoided by the traditional privacy of arbitration procedures. Institutions and bodies, which provide facilities and framed rules for the arbitration of commercial disputes, exist in practically all countries.
Even though these are considered national institutions, international as well as national disputes can be submitted to them. The World Bank developed a mechanism to solve international investment disputes through arbitration or consultation inin order to foster private investment in developing countries.
The International Center for Settlement of Investment Disputes ICSID was created to provide a reliable dispute resolution mechanism to private investors who take the risk of investing in countries with unfavorable investment climates.
The rationale for the creation of this institution is that the guarantee of a fair process renders investment in "political risky" countries financially justifiable. The ICSID adjudicates over disputes between states and the investing private entity of another state.Five years after the program started, the Police Foundation, in Washington, D.C., published an evaluation of the foot-patrol project.
Based on its analysis of a carefully controlled experiment. It occurred to me, in California in June and in Atlanta in July and in New Orleans in August, in the course of watching first the California primary and then the Democratic and Republican national conventions, that it had not been by accident that the people with whom I had preferred to spend time in high school had, on the whole, hung out in gas .
Here are the sections you will find: Section 1: What I'll be discussing in this how-to essay; Section 2: Understand who or what you're hiding from. This essay will discuss how the existing weak enforcement mechanism is hindering the State Parties from reaching the objectives of the CRC.
II. THE EXISTING ENFORCEMENT MECHANISM OF THE CRC Presently, there is one system of enforcement for the CRC and that is the State Party reporting process.
Article 44 of the CRC obligates each State Party to.
The Business Procedures Manual serves several purposes. Primarily, it sets forth the essential procedural components that each institution within the University System of Georgia must follow to meet both Board of Regents policy mandates and the statutory or regulatory requirements of the state of Georgia and the federal government.
John Locke (—) John Locke was among the most famous philosophers and political theorists of the 17 th century. He is often regarded as the founder of a school of thought known as British Empiricism, and he made foundational contributions to modern theories of limited, liberal government.